by Fronetics | Apr 20, 2015 | Blog, Leadership, Strategy, Talent
It’s true. You need to work less and stop checking your emails.
Somewhere in California, in the middle of the Redwood Forest, lies Camp Grounded. The school bus on which campers arrive comes alive on weekends with the activity of its new passengers – sing-alongs, face painting, snacks. Undoubtedly that energy is driven by the excitement of what the imminent camp experience will hold. The small cabins, which serve as the home base for campers to rest with their bunkmates in between sessions of arts and crafts, archery, and campfires, are nostalgic throwbacks to the 1930s American camp experience. The camp owners, indeed aiming to recall a slower, simpler time, have built the 2,000 acre camp to offer all the typical activities and (lack of) amenities you’d expect from a secluded camp.
What you might not be able to immediately discern about this camp, though, is that it caters exclusively to adults. That’s right, campers range in age from 19 to 72. The other most striking feature of Camp Grounded is their policy on digital technology; it is strictly prohibited.
Why are these people giving up their laptops, cellphones, tablets? What would make a grown person want to digitally disconnect from the world? Turns out, quite a few things.
A 2014 Gallup poll reported that the average workweek now clocks in at 47 hours a week. And troublingly, nearly four in ten Americans are working at least 50 hours a week. It’s not a far jump to conclude that advancements in digital technology have made it difficult for workers to set firm time parameters for job-related responsibilities. It certainly fits with Pew Research Center’s finding that 61% and 54% believe email and the internet, respectively, to be “very important” in doing their work. The lack of conventional parameters and the pervasive ability for workers to access tools of productivity outside standard work hours has some startling implications for the state of the American workforce and might just explain why adult campers are flocking to Camp Grounded in droves.
Long hours are making employees sick and causing injures.
A University of Massachusetts study revealed workers who routinely work long hours are thought be at risk for numerous physical conditions including high blood pressure, diabetes, chronic infections, and even death. Research has also linked that those who spend four or more hours sitting per day to a 125% increase in heart disease risk, even when controlling for diet and exercise. Another study, in which the University College in London found that long work hours can double the risk of depression, shows the emotional health of workers who log long hours suffers too. Alarmingly, a high number of work hours are also correlated with increased risk of workplace accidents. A National Institutes of Health report states that working at least 60 hours per week increases a worker’s likelihood of injury by 23%.
Workers are stressed as a result of not setting firm work-life boundaries.
Many of the health concerns presented by employees working protracted hours are stress-based diseases and illnesses. Stress can be characterized by a cyclical progression; the cycle of poor performance and impaired decision making, brought on by illness, sluggishness and decreased productivity, can all exacerbate stress. Furthermore, working long hours away from home can cause familial stress since, often times, one spouse shoulders the burden of unequally spilt household tasks and child rearing responsibilities. For businesses, the bad news about stress is just as alarming. Between 5% to 8% of all annual healthcare-related costs are stress-related – passed on to employers to the tune of $180 billion each year.
The more hours employees work, the less productive they are.
Probably a universal experience for office employees is the dazed feeling that comes after spending an extended amount of time working in front of a computer screen. The eyes tend to gloss over, the back becomes stiff, and the mind goes a little fuzzy. The evolution of the modern workweek notwithstanding, it’s interesting to note that logging long hours doesn’t make employees more productive. In fact, it can have the opposite effect. The Economist wrote a piece in 2013 which concluded “with higher working hours, labor output per hour fell.” Meaning, the correlation between working more hours and being more productive simply doesn’t exist. Taxing the mind and body with work for extended periods of time leaves employees tired, sluggish, and unproductive.
Overworked employees are typically disengaged employees.
Despite all the aforementioned negative consequences employees are willing to endure in order to work long hours, there’s really little employees or employers are getting in return. That’s because, for all the extra hours workers are putting in, it actually drives disengagement. Left wholly left unchecked, the culmination of issues arising from an unbalanced work-home life can increase absenteeism and turnover. Simply put, employees logging long hours are significantly more prone to burnout.
After being presented with the destructive effects clocking long hours can have on our bodies, relationships, and careers, revisiting the issue of a voluntary digital detox seems like a virtuous approach to our constant connectedness. But you don’t have to shell out hundreds of dollars in order to reap the benefits (device-free! no j-o-b talk!) Camp Grounded offers. Start by setting firm boundaries for work and home life. Ask a spouse or partner to hold you accountable. Block access to email on your devices during nights and weekends. If that seems too extreme, consider delaying your email responses until the next work morning. Implementing these small changes in the way you interact with your job responsibilities outside typical business hours can improve your physical and mental health and advance your career. If you find that you need a little more motivation to unplug and disengage from work, you’ll likely find it in the sing-alongs and talent shows performed by weary workers, turned cheery campers at Camp Grounded.
by Fronetics | Apr 15, 2015 | Blog, Leadership, Strategy, Talent
You might be surprised to find currently untapped financial gains just by putting employee happiness at the top of your priority list.
The way we work has fundamentally changed. There’s no doubt it is still evolving, but what we know about the way we work is that it can no longer be summed up by the decades-old “going to work” experience. Company-owned buildings, offices, and cubicles are no longer required to accommodate employees and the growing trend of companies offering flexible scheduling and remote work options for employees has substantial implications. There’s good news in that these new employment structures are impacting employee satisfaction and productivity in ways that employees and employers alike can celebrate.
Of the most significant factors affecting employee satisfaction is the employee-manager relationship. Communication is essential for relationships to flourish – especially employee-manager relationships. A recent Gallup poll found that employee engagement was highest among those with daily communication with their managers. By leveraging digital communication tools, employees who work remotely are able to have just as much, if not more, interaction with supervisors. Consistent, regular access to management creates a culture of connectedness and accountability – a culture where employee satisfaction is high. Not only does this allow for nimble adaptations in project approach or client strategy, but the immediate feedback loop positively affects employee engagement and motivation. The emergence of this unique employee-manager structure has allowed for managers to effectively monitor work and provide meaningful feedback, but to avoid micromanagement.
The most effective managers have been shown to be the ones who have respect for their employees as individuals. These managers actively work to help their employees find an ideal work-life balance. Recognizing and responding accordingly to situations where employees are disengaged, either physically or emotionally, from their work responsibilities is at the heart of building a relationship of trust and conviction.
Even though remote work arrangements seem to run counterintuitive to expanding the capacity of workplace productivity, giving employees the flexibility to fit work around their life actually improves worker productivity. The effects of building a company culture where employee satisfaction is valued translates into increased efficiency. That is, a happy and well-managed staff is likely to stay engaged, motivated, and committed to company objectives.
The flexibility that working remotely provides makes it easier for workers to strike their ideal work-life balance. A significant finding emerged from a 2000 study in which researchers found that on average workers reached peak productivity in their 30s and 40s. Most often concurrently, these same workers are tasked in their home lives with parenting responsibilities and the care of aging parents. Giving employees options to maintain flexible work schedules allows employees to give equal attention to both home and work life, enabling maximum productivity. What’s more, by eliminating commute time and spending less time in meetings, people who work from home actually spend more time working. Some find managing work responsibilities from a quieter environment, as opposed to a noisy office, more conducive to productivity.
Presented with all the benefits flexible scheduling and remote work options have to offer, some companies might find it tempting to quickly implement a flexible work program in order to start realizing benefits. But consider that this new work structuring also brings with it a new set of issues for managers to navigate. Supervising employees who aren’t location-specific and monitoring performance without personally interfacing require companies to put thoughtful initial focus on building a solid communication structure and setting manageable expectations for employees. Clear articulation of these expectations and structures is required for success.
While this type of work structuring might not be a good match for every employee or every workplace, the opportunity exists for employers to positively affect worker happiness while simultaneously increasing productivity. If your company is interested in exploring the benefits of offering flexible scheduling and remote workplaces, consider a trial period or experimental program. You might be surprised to find currently untapped financial gains just by putting employee happiness at the top of your priority list.
by Fronetics | Apr 15, 2015 | Blog, Leadership, Strategy, Talent
You might be surprised to find currently untapped financial gains just by putting employee happiness at the top of your priority list.
The way we work has fundamentally changed. There’s no doubt it is still evolving, but what we know about the way we work is that it can no longer be summed up by the decades-old “going to work” experience. Company-owned buildings, offices, and cubicles are no longer required to accommodate employees and the growing trend of companies offering flexible scheduling and remote work options for employees has substantial implications. There’s good news in that these new employment structures are impacting employee satisfaction and productivity in ways that employees and employers alike can celebrate.
Of the most significant factors affecting employee satisfaction is the employee-manager relationship. Communication is essential for relationships to flourish – especially employee-manager relationships. A recent Gallup poll found that employee engagement was highest among those with daily communication with their managers. By leveraging digital communication tools, employees who work remotely are able to have just as much, if not more, interaction with supervisors. Consistent, regular access to management creates a culture of connectedness and accountability – a culture where employee satisfaction is high. Not only does this allow for nimble adaptations in project approach or client strategy, but the immediate feedback loop positively affects employee engagement and motivation. The emergence of this unique employee-manager structure has allowed for managers to effectively monitor work and provide meaningful feedback, but to avoid micromanagement.
The most effective managers have been shown to be the ones who have respect for their employees as individuals. These managers actively work to help their employees find an ideal work-life balance. Recognizing and responding accordingly to situations where employees are disengaged, either physically or emotionally, from their work responsibilities is at the heart of building a relationship of trust and conviction.
Even though remote work arrangements seem to run counterintuitive to expanding the capacity of workplace productivity, giving employees the flexibility to fit work around their life actually improves worker productivity. The effects of building a company culture where employee satisfaction is valued translates into increased efficiency. That is, a happy and well-managed staff is likely to stay engaged, motivated, and committed to company objectives.
The flexibility that working remotely provides makes it easier for workers to strike their ideal work-life balance. A significant finding emerged from a 2000 study in which researchers found that on average workers reached peak productivity in their 30s and 40s. Most often concurrently, these same workers are tasked in their home lives with parenting responsibilities and the care of aging parents. Giving employees options to maintain flexible work schedules allows employees to give equal attention to both home and work life, enabling maximum productivity. What’s more, by eliminating commute time and spending less time in meetings, people who work from home actually spend more time working. Some find managing work responsibilities from a quieter environment, as opposed to a noisy office, more conducive to productivity.
Presented with all the benefits flexible scheduling and remote work options have to offer, some companies might find it tempting to quickly implement a flexible work program in order to start realizing benefits. But consider that this new work structuring also brings with it a new set of issues for managers to navigate. Supervising employees who aren’t location-specific and monitoring performance without personally interfacing require companies to put thoughtful initial focus on building a solid communication structure and setting manageable expectations for employees. Clear articulation of these expectations and structures is required for success.
While this type of work structuring might not be a good match for every employee or every workplace, the opportunity exists for employers to positively affect worker happiness while simultaneously increasing productivity. If your company is interested in exploring the benefits of offering flexible scheduling and remote workplaces, consider a trial period or experimental program. You might be surprised to find currently untapped financial gains just by putting employee happiness at the top of your priority list.
by Fronetics | Apr 14, 2015 | Blog, Leadership, Marketing, Talent
As much as 80 percent of employee turnover is due to bad hiring decisions, which doesn’t fare well for a company since a poor hiring choice can cost from 1.5x to 3.5x of that person’s annual salary. Consider an employee who earns $50,000 a year. If that person is a bad hire it could cost a company up to $175,000. The higher the position, the higher the salary, the higher the cost is to lose or fire that person.
More than ever companies are hiring project-based professionals who provide a specific skill-set. These placements might be short-term or long-term, depending on the company’s needs. According to the Wall Street Journal, in March 2014, more than 2.8 million workers, or 2.5% of the workforce, held temporary jobs, up from 1.7 million in 2009. One reason for the spike in numbers is due to companies having to reassess their processes and spending after the recession. Some of these employees, many of whom hold multiple part-time jobs as temps or contractors, are the new semi-permanent, temporary, or “perma-temp” work force. They are in charge of their own brand, skill-set, and advancement.
Why do companies continue to lean in this direction, even while the economy is recovering?
Let’s have a look at the benefits for employers:
- Hiring a temp or contractor allows a company to meet work demand and deadlines without having to make rushed decisions about long-term, expensive, permanent staffing.
- By hiring a contractor or temp employee companies cut expensive benefit, administrative, and payroll costs, not to mention unemployment insurance.
- Bringing in temps or contractors can boost morale amongst other employees who may feel overtaxed. A temp or consultant can take some of the work overflow from other employees.
- Temporary and contracted employees are often eager to work hard to prove themselves and gain experience. Some may be coming off of a period of unemployment and anxious to get back to work. Temporary and contract workers may work creatively and tirelessly to meet their own financial obligations. They might not have the same loyalty as full-time, permanent employees, but since they have to fend for themselves, they are not complacent. According to University of Illinois professor Joe Broschak, “On average, these temporary workers displayed better performance relative to goals compared to their full-time counterparts.” When those temps were hired on as full-time employees “they continued to become better workers after becoming permanent.”
- Temp and contract workers can offer an area of specialization that a company might be lacking in current staffing. It might be less expensive to hire a new contracted employee with years of experience in a specific skill-set than to train a current employee.
Semi-permanent work is not ideal for everyone. Some employees, especially those seeking security, certainty, and the full gamut of benefits will not be satisfied with this work. One concern is how temporary or semi-permanent employees are paid and treated. If paid fairly and treated well, this paradigm will work smoothly for some people.
What are the benefits for employees?
- Many contracting and temporary positions allow for flexibility. The jobs might be part-time and allow for adjusted hours that could accommodate an employee’s home life, another part-time job, or other interests. Because these workers have a different status than permanent, full-time employees, the same “in-office face-time” expectations may not apply to a consultant or temporary worker.
- If a temporary worker or consultant is hired for a specific skill set, they are able to focus on work they’re good at and interested in. If they’ve been out of work they can use this as an opportunity to sharpen their skillset or, perhaps, learn a new one.
- Working on a short-term project might be freeing and invigorating. Having more of a sense of control over one’s own branding, hours, and projects is exciting for many people.
- This can be a wonderful opportunity for people to network, build their personal “press kit”, and garner new, current references.
- Temporary positions often turn into long-term, semi-permanent project based consulting positions. Some people find the combination of interesting work and flexibility perfect for their lives.
It is important to remember that every dollar paid to employees –temporary, semi-temporary, “perma-temp”, full-time, or part-time—is not a dollar taken away from the bottom line, but an investment in the company. Finding the right fit that benefits employers and employees is critical.
by Fronetics | Apr 14, 2015 | Blog, Leadership, Marketing, Talent
As much as 80 percent of employee turnover is due to bad hiring decisions, which doesn’t fare well for a company since a poor hiring choice can cost from 1.5x to 3.5x of that person’s annual salary. Consider an employee who earns $50,000 a year. If that person is a bad hire it could cost a company up to $175,000. The higher the position, the higher the salary, the higher the cost is to lose or fire that person.
More than ever companies are hiring project-based professionals who provide a specific skill-set. These placements might be short-term or long-term, depending on the company’s needs. According to the Wall Street Journal, in March 2014, more than 2.8 million workers, or 2.5% of the workforce, held temporary jobs, up from 1.7 million in 2009. One reason for the spike in numbers is due to companies having to reassess their processes and spending after the recession. Some of these employees, many of whom hold multiple part-time jobs as temps or contractors, are the new semi-permanent, temporary, or “perma-temp” work force. They are in charge of their own brand, skill-set, and advancement.
Why do companies continue to lean in this direction, even while the economy is recovering?
Let’s have a look at the benefits for employers:
- Hiring a temp or contractor allows a company to meet work demand and deadlines without having to make rushed decisions about long-term, expensive, permanent staffing.
- By hiring a contractor or temp employee companies cut expensive benefit, administrative, and payroll costs, not to mention unemployment insurance.
- Bringing in temps or contractors can boost morale amongst other employees who may feel overtaxed. A temp or consultant can take some of the work overflow from other employees.
- Temporary and contracted employees are often eager to work hard to prove themselves and gain experience. Some may be coming off of a period of unemployment and anxious to get back to work. Temporary and contract workers may work creatively and tirelessly to meet their own financial obligations. They might not have the same loyalty as full-time, permanent employees, but since they have to fend for themselves, they are not complacent. According to University of Illinois professor Joe Broschak, “On average, these temporary workers displayed better performance relative to goals compared to their full-time counterparts.” When those temps were hired on as full-time employees “they continued to become better workers after becoming permanent.”
- Temp and contract workers can offer an area of specialization that a company might be lacking in current staffing. It might be less expensive to hire a new contracted employee with years of experience in a specific skill-set than to train a current employee.
Semi-permanent work is not ideal for everyone. Some employees, especially those seeking security, certainty, and the full gamut of benefits will not be satisfied with this work. One concern is how temporary or semi-permanent employees are paid and treated. If paid fairly and treated well, this paradigm will work smoothly for some people.
What are the benefits for employees?
- Many contracting and temporary positions allow for flexibility. The jobs might be part-time and allow for adjusted hours that could accommodate an employee’s home life, another part-time job, or other interests. Because these workers have a different status than permanent, full-time employees, the same “in-office face-time” expectations may not apply to a consultant or temporary worker.
- If a temporary worker or consultant is hired for a specific skill set, they are able to focus on work they’re good at and interested in. If they’ve been out of work they can use this as an opportunity to sharpen their skillset or, perhaps, learn a new one.
- Working on a short-term project might be freeing and invigorating. Having more of a sense of control over one’s own branding, hours, and projects is exciting for many people.
- This can be a wonderful opportunity for people to network, build their personal “press kit”, and garner new, current references.
- Temporary positions often turn into long-term, semi-permanent project based consulting positions. Some people find the combination of interesting work and flexibility perfect for their lives.
It is important to remember that every dollar paid to employees –temporary, semi-temporary, “perma-temp”, full-time, or part-time—is not a dollar taken away from the bottom line, but an investment in the company. Finding the right fit that benefits employers and employees is critical.
by Fronetics | Mar 23, 2015 | Blog, Supply Chain, Talent
What you need to know about the supply chain talent gap.
The supply chain talent gap has been called a “perfect storm.” Few topics are shrouded in such doom and gloom. Every report cites doomsday statistics of the impending crisis when, by 2025, 60 million baby boomers will exit the workforce, leaving a gigantic gap when 40 million millennials take their place. To make matters worse, the retirement exodus is only one factor contributing to the sinking ship. Future supply chain professionals need to master not only the hard analytical skills but also the soft leadership skills fueled by the transition from an industrial economy to an economy grounded in service and information. In numbers, it means only 20% of the workforce will possess the skills required of 60% of all new supply chain jobs.
But listen up, all you forward-thinking millennials and midlevel supply chain managers with cross-functional expertise. There’s some good news: The market can’t get enough of you.
Yes, amid all the dire facts, there is opportunity. There has never been a better time to be, so to speak, on the other side of the table — a college graduate or a motivated professional looking for a career with upward mobility? What other field of work can offer as much promise to new recruits and current employees as the supply chain industry?
Just as all reports predict a brewing crisis, they also tout talent management as the primary remedy. For a self-motivated individual, fresh out of college or in the midst of a corporate climb, this focus on professional development presents a smorgasbord of options. Many companies have taken note and adopted a strategy of action for recruiting and retaining new talent. A growing number of university program offerings reflect a strengthening partnership between academia and the supply chain industry. Many supply chain companies are building partnerships with academic programs to offer internship opportunities; a move that’s creating strong early relationships with students and will likely have a positive effect on future recruitment efforts. A company that can offer its current staff competitive salaries in addition to cross-functional training is much better positioned to meet the challenges of the talent shortage and the evolving nature and demands of the supply chain.
Another way companies within the logistics and supply chain industries are attracting top talent is through their use of social media. Considering the global reach and vast talent pool of LinkedIn’s 300 million users, the business-focused social network is helping companies with open positions that might require a unique and specific skill set to connect with candidates across the globe.
What’s clear is that companies that follow a plan of inaction will be left behind. This new talent pool will swiftly turn down a company that remains stuck on strict functional divisions and favors the old siloed approach to doing business. Many supply chain managers have grown up in such divided organizations themselves, so they have been slow to take appropriate action to retain and train talent, according to a Supply Chain Insights survey, leaving those better prepared with a competitive advantage.
If a company does not appeal to the desires of top candidates, individuals will take their talent elsewhere. And there will always be another company to welcome them. As Rebooting Work author Maynard Webb points out in a 2013 interview with Elance, in order for companies to remain competitive they’ll need to adapt to the modern workforce. “Companies have traditionally thought of people as a disposable resource,” he says. “They have valued their buildings much more than employees… this doesn’t make sense in a world where the best people can choose to work wherever they want. Businesses have to realize that some jobs can be done from anywhere, anytime, and save the brick and mortar buildings for the few jobs that demand a physical presence.”
Touting the unlimited opportunities and unparalleled growth in the supply chain field should be part of turning the tide. Sure, there is a lot of talk about doom, but mainly for those companies that fail to attract and retain top talent.
