by Jennifer Hart Yim | Apr 26, 2018 | Blog, Current Events, Logistics, Strategy, Supply Chain, Talent
With the rising demand for professionals in Supply Chain Management and Procurement, there’s a lot of employment activity, especially in short-term contracts.
This guest post comes to us from Argentus Supply Chain Recruiting, a boutique recruitment firm specializing in Supply Chain Management and Procurement.
As a boutique recruitment agency, we at Argentus are on the front-lines of the churn in the job market. We speak with potential job candidates every day. Some of them are passive, interested in moving into new opportunities when we reach out to them. Some of them are active, reaching out to us because they want to make a move. With the economy experiencing a prolonged growth spurt, and demand for professionals in Supply Chain Management and Procurement – our area of specialty – going up, there’s a lot of activity, especially in short-term contracts where companies are onboarding talent for their change management and business transformation expertise.
There are so many reasons why people seek out a new job. Sometimes it’s based on major life changes: a geographical move, say, or someone getting back into the workforce after a maternity leave. But why do passive candidates seek out new jobs, particularly in Supply Chain and Procurement?
We speak to a lot of candidates, so we have our ears to the ground in terms of the subtler reasons that star performers in these functions get the desire to make a move. It’s not out of a desire for more money as often as you might think. More often than not, it’s the more intangible factors.
Because employee retention is so important from a cost-saving and culture standpoint, we thought it would be useful to lay out some of the most common reasons why Supply Chain and Procurement professionals become passive candidates:
1. They’re siloed
We hear this reason a lot from candidates, but it still isn’t considered by companies as much as it should be. We know that one of the best ways to grow your Supply Chain career is to gain exposure to diverse parts of the function – from Logistics and Distribution, to Procurement, to Inventory Management, to Planning.
In too many organizations, these functions are siloed off from each-other, and that stops candidates from getting the experience they want to move up into more senior roles. It also stops the Supply Chain from being as effective as it would be if it was fully integrated. Next thing you know, your top performers are taking calls because they don’t want to be pigeonholed.
2. They’re tired of working with outdated technology
Supply Chain and Procurement technology is becoming more digital, just like the rest of the economy. And updating your technological profile can be a massive undertaking, with lots of risks. But the most forward-looking and high-potential candidates want to be working with the latest Supply Chain technology, keeping their skills relevant for the future. If you’re still working only with Excel, you might risk losing candidates to companies that have taken the plunge and invested in continuing technological improvement.
3. They’re not getting support from senior leadership
As we wrote about recently – and we received a ton of feedback on that piece – ineffective leadership in Procurement and Supply Chain can have huge ramifications all the way down a business. If leadership doesn’t have the people skills to help build buy-in for the function across the business, if they micromanage instead of letting managers and sole contributors shine, those people are going to start picking up the phone when a recruiter calls. But it goes upward too: effective leaders in Procurement and Supply Chain will get the itch to move if they don’t have support from C-level executives in a business.
4. Work/life balance isn’t up to snuff
Work/life balance is a hot topic in the talent world, to the point of being a cliché, but it’s worth mentioning: people who don’t have support from a work/life balance perspective will start to seek companies that have work from home policies, flexible schedules, educational opportunities, and other benefits. In 2018, companies can no longer see these programs as “perks” or “throw-ins.” Having solid, articulated work/life balance policies is vital to winning the war for talent.
5. They’re uninspired in the workplace
While Supply Chain and Procurement have historically been seen as “dry” functions, this reputation is changing fast. With the rise of digitization and globalization, they’re becoming more fast-paced, with more strategic potential and impact on a business’ long-term structure and profitability. But some companies still treat their Supply Chain and Procurement employees as purely transactional workers whose jobs are only to fill out orders and put out day-to-day fires. If you’re not being strategic, or not offering opportunities for advancement into more strategic positions, your best Supply Chain employees will, quite frankly, get bored and leave.
6. They’re realizing how indemand they are
As we’ve written about a lot, the retirement of the baby boomer generation as well as greater expectations placed on Procurement and Supply Chain are creating a deficit of talent in the marketplace. With the economy approaching full employment in 2018, this is even truer than it was before. But many companies still aren’t realizing the huge demand for Supply Chain and Procurement talent in this marketplace. Too many companies still have assume their employees are “just happy to have a job,” but take it from us as a company that speaks with dozens of candidates in the field every day: they’re realizing their worth, and fielding opportunities to meet their full potential. If your company isn’t providing those opportunities, they’ll go somewhere that does.
Sometimes it’s a combination of the above factors that causes a top performer to want to leave, and sometimes it’s even other factors we haven’t mentioned. So what does your organization do to retain star performers? As a candidate, have you ever left a role for one of the above reasons, or another that we missed? Let us know in the comments!
Related posts:
by Jennifer Hart Yim | Oct 26, 2017 | Blog, Strategy, Talent
More and more companies are contemplating how to cut their expenses and retain exceptional talent by offering work from home policies.
This guest post comes to us from Argentus Supply Chain Recruiting, a boutique recruitment firm specializing in Supply Chain Management and Procurement.
Time was, companies in the corporate world measured their employees’ success by time that they spent at their desks and in meetings. But over the past 10-15 years, the workplace has seen some radical transformations spurred by the rise of digital communications. Companies are becoming less formal, less rigid in their expectations, and more likely to hire on short-term contracts even for high-skilled positions. Every company is different, but today’s most successful corporate cultures are more interested in evaluating employees based on their results rather than process-oriented metrics like time spent in the office.
Companies are competing for talent by offering a more humane workplace, including an emphasis on work / life balance that allows high performers to maintain a family and hobbies as well as a demanding career without going insane. Since work / life balance became a buzzword, more companies are paying lip service to the concept. But a few big companies are stepping up and recognizing that the concept can pay dividends for companies as well as workers.
One of the biggest related growing trends in the workforce is the rise of work from home policies. Tools like Slack, Google Drive, Skype and others are making working from home (or offsite) more feasible than ever before. Companies have long offered occasional “telecommuting,” and many startup-style corporate cultures are known for their flexibility, but more major companies are offering official, codified work from home policies. IBM recently slashed its work from home policy, but organizations as large as Amazon, Xerox, GE and Dell have adopted official policies allowing employees to work offsite at least some of the time.
Anecdotally, as a recruitment firm, we’re seeing more companies include official work from home policies in their job descriptions when they’re hiring – recognizing that it’s a great selling point for people hoping to avoid lengthy commutes. The practice is growing. According to data from GlobalWorkplaceAnalytics.com, the number of individuals at corporate jobs (not self-employed) who are able to work from home has increased 115% since 2005, which is almost 10 times as fast as the rest of the workforce.
Working from home can be great for candidates with young families, those who want to avoid lengthy commutes, or who want to be able to concentrate without the distractions of a busy office environment (putting aside, for now, the distractions of the home or a 3rd party working space). Working from home is also green; it saves on greenhouse gases from commuting. But they can also offer dividends to companies themselves: a typical business can save up to $11,000 per person per year by allowing candidates to work from home at least some of the time. This is money that your company can shave off the bottom line, or put into higher salaries to try to attract even stronger performers.
It’s a great policy, and workers are demanding work from home policies more than ever before, especially passive candidates who need to be enticed to make a move. As we recently mentioned in another post, more of the candidates we speak with are asking about work from home policies when we approach them with opportunities. According to statistics, 80-90% of peoplewho don’t work from home want to start doing so at least 2-3 days a week to split their time between the kind of collaboration you can accomplish in an office, and the concentration you can achieve at home.
It’s where things are going, with more tools that make working from home easy coming online every day, and more Fortune 500 companies embracing it. Yet only 7% of corporations in the U.S. make working from home available to most of their employees. It can be a radical shift for a company to adopt a work from home policy, so it’s no wonder why so many companies are reticent. It doesn’t work for every industry and organization, but it can be an excellent strategy for talent attraction and retention.
Whether you’re a candidate thinking about looking to avoid a commute, or a company thinking about how you can save on overhead and attract exceptional talent, it’s worth thinking about working from home policies and what they have to offer the workplace.
Related posts:
by Fronetics | Jul 5, 2017 | Blog, Talent
Thinking of making a professional change? Here are some questions to consider before taking the plunge and overcommitting.
We’ve all been asked to take on new projects at work when we’re already completely swamped. In the moment, it can be very hard to say no. And we’ve all jumped on LinkedIn to see what other opportunities are out there. More money, less headaches. The grass is always greener.
I recently read an article in the Harvard Business Review about asking some tough questions of yourself before making a professional change. It got me thinking about our tendency (my tendency) to overcommit.
Executive and life coach Regan Walsh’s article, Before You Agree to Take on New Work, Ask 3 Questions, offers three key questions to ask before making any major professional decisions. Walsh believes that you need to move past the “should” in order to find fulfillment in your work.
Shoulds and wants
“Shoulds are the things we do out of obligation because we have not thoughtfully considered our true objectives, even out of fear,” she writes. “What if we never get another opportunity? What will others think of us if we say no? What will we think of ourselves if we say no? Sometimes, shoulds even seem like things we want to do.”
But honestly, shoulds are often things that are in direct opposition of our wants. Instead of focusing on professional goals and aspirations, we become burnt out by the “must dos.”
We must keep moving up the corporate ladder. We must take that promotion that means double the workload. We must say yes to new projects that could lead to new opportunities.
It’s worth taking a pause to consider why you’re making a professional change and if it will, in fact, be for the better.
3 questions to ask yourself
Here are three simple questions to ask yourself before making any major professional decisions.
1. What is my motivation?
Ideally your motivation for any professional change will come from within. Oftentimes this is easier said than done. External factors can play a large role in motivating our decisions. Money, professional growth, a new title — these are hard incentives to ignore.
But if you’re seeking more than just employment, real fulfillment from your job, you should start with your passions. If you’re making decisions based on your interests, your job will become more than a paycheck.
More and more employees are seeking a sense of community, educational opportunities, and a sense of purpose from their career paths. Aligning these opportunities with your personal interests will help make your job more than just a way to pay your mortgage.
2. Does it align with my values?
To answer this question, you need to identify what your core values are. What matters to you? What principles do you live by?
For most of us, these core values can include honesty and integrity. You can find these words in endless corporate value statements, but saying it and living are very different. If you can find an organization that stands by its value statements and works to embody these values, you will find that a sense of pride in your professional setting.
In a world based on data and analytics, finding an organization that can move past the numbers to create opportunities for its employees that will make them better members of their community will increase employees’ commitment to their company.
“Ideally, an organization’s core values explicitly define how people will behave with each other and with customers. When values succeed, the daily behaviors of your people will embody the core values you set forth,” Chris Cancialosi says in 2 Ways to Ensure Your Corporate Culture and Values Align.
3. Do I have a choice?
Your supervisor walks into your office and announces a new project she’d like you to spearhead. Your first reaction might be flattery and pride. Taking a step back, you might ask yourself, “Did I have a choice?” Were you forced into taking on more work? Are you even interested in the project?
Self-determination theory suggests that in order to act, or to feel motivated to act, we need to feel that we’re in control. We’ll enjoy something more if we recognize that it’s a choice.
Just as in our personal lives, when we feel like we have a choice in the matter, we’re more likely to give it our best effort.
Companies are expecting more and more of employees, and often in less time. It’s easy to get overwhelmed. Taking a step back to realize you have a choice in the matter — or, at the very least, the ability to communicate these feelings with your employer — will help you keep a balance at work.
Before taking on new projects or additional workloads, consider how much time it will take to complete the assignments and how much impact it will have on your existing workload.
We are all influenced by obligations. It’s easy to say yes to things, professionally and personally, because we feel like we have to. In order to feel real satisfaction from our professional choices, we need to look internally. Saying yes to things that align with your core values and being motivated by your passions takes time and practice, but the end results will far outweigh the shoulds.
Related posts:
by Fronetics | May 9, 2017 | Blog, Leadership, Talent
Employers that can reduce stresses surrounding childcare increase their chances of retaining their most talented employees.
Many companies struggle with attracting and, more importantly, retaining their best employees. There are many reasons why, of course. But one of them that we don’t talk enough about in the supply chain — though it’s been gaining national attention lately — is the issue of childcare.
This is a very personal matter to me, a working mother who struggled to find a balance between the cost of childcare and the price of my employment. And that doesn’t even cover the emotional, physical, and logistical challenges of finding somewhere to deposit young children for a good portion of the day while you earn a paycheck. But I digress…
The staggering cost of childcare
According to Care.com, the national average for at-home care is $28,354 per year, while in-center care is $8,589 per year. These numbers are often staggering to parents, who are not physically or emotionally ready to part with their newborns after a short, and for most, unpaid maternity or paternity leave.
It’s Working Project and Forty Weeks founder Julia Beck recently wrote about concerns parents consistently face when heading back to work after having a baby. At the top of the list is childcare and a general lack of support from the workplace. “Support from employers makes or breaks the deal, creating either a manageable new reality or the need for a backup plan (or even an exit),” she writes.
Don’t believe that’s true? Take a look at this statistic: 83% of millennials would leave their jobs for one with better family care benefits. As millennials represent an increasing percentage of the supply chain fabric, it’s a concern that should increasingly matter to employers.
Here’s the good news: Every challenge employees face is an opportunity for employers to gain a leg up on their competition for talent. Easing the stresses surrounding childcare can be a simple yet significant way that companies can support their most talented employees, who also happen to be working parents.
How employers can ease childcare stresses for working parents
So what can your company do to help make work/life balance more obtainable for your employees? Here are three practical suggestions that are fairly simple for employers to implement but that might make a world of difference for working parents.
1) Make schedules predictable.
When a parent learns of a last-minute, late-afternoon meeting, they must scramble to find someone to pick up their son or daughter from daycare, miss a long-anticipated school or sporting event, or otherwise come up short on time promised to their families. Setting rules around scheduling meetings can help avoid this additional stress on parents.
For example, some organizations have a policy that no meetings can start before 9:30am or after 4:30pm, so parents don’t have to worry about drop-off or pick-up with daycare facilities. Allowing parents to focus on work and not worrying about running late for soccer practice makes them more productive employees.
2) Offer flexibility.
BirchBox’s VP of People and Culture, Melissa Enbar, explains that her organization offers flexibility around the hours employees work and the location they work from.
Nowadays most jobs can be effectively performed from home or another location. This is a luxury that makes sense for working parents — and it’s an opportunity for companies to offer an extra benefit for employees who want or need to set their schedules around their families.
3) Aid in childcare options.
Whether your company offers on-site care or not, you can still help ease the stress of finding reliable and affordable childcare for your employees.
A good starting point is creating resources for new parents beginning their childcare search. This can be as simple as posting a list of childcare facilities recommended by other employees or as in depth as offering backup childcare options for emergency situations. Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, for example, offers a reduced rate for six days of emergency care at home through Care.com, plus access to a backup child care center, according to one employee.
Let’s face it, securing a safe, nurturing childcare option is a challenge for all working parents. When they are plagued by related stresses — such as an unforeseen late meeting, illness, or other everyday concern — parents aren’t able to give their full attention to their job. This comes at a cost to the employee and ultimately, the business.
There are things you, as an employer, can do to make working for your company more appealing to parents. Helping employees navigate childcare stresses will be benefit not only the individual, but the company as well, in terms of employee retention. After all, a flexible-hours or no-4 p.m.-meetings policy may be the differentiator that keeps your talent working for you rather than your competitors.
Related posts:
by Jennifer Hart Yim | Jan 26, 2017 | Blog, Strategy, Talent
The “Right to Disconnect” is combating round-the-clock email culture, but can better work/life balance help boost employees’ productivity?
This guest post comes to us from Argentus Supply Chain Recruiting, a boutique recruitment firm specializing in Supply Chain Management and Procurement.
Here’s a new frontier in work-life balance: For the past several years, work-life balance has been one of the biggest topics in employer and HR circles. Companies are recognizing the productivity benefits of flex time, childcare assistance, on-site stress workshops, and other initiatives designed to make employees happier. They’re also using work-life balance to help attract and retain the best candidates. Read any (good) modern job description, and you’ll see lots of language from companies recognizing the importance of having a life outside of work.
But anyone who’s worked at a few different companies knows that every company has a different track record in terms of actually implementing work-life balance initiatives, and not just paying lip-service to them.
The Right to Disconnect
So here’s an interesting solution from abroad: As of January 1, a new law in France affords workers the “Right to Disconnect” from their emails after hours. In France, a country long-associated with the development of rights, companies with more than 50 employees must now negotiate a new protocol with employees to make sure that their work obligations — like email — don’t carry over to after-work hours.
Europe has long been characterized in North America as laissez-faire when it comes to working hours, mandating more weeks of vacation than Canada (where 3 weeks is the standard) and the U.S. (which typically affords a stingy 2 weeks of vacation). There’s always been a stronger cultural attachment to leisure hours in Europe, where 35-hour workweeks are common, so it isn’t surprising that such a law comes from France.
It’s also not surprising that the idea of completely banning after-work emails has been ridiculed in North America, where many employees work long hours, take lunch at their desks, and answer emails around the clock to prove their value. But outlets like Time magazine have reported on how round-the-clock email culture has taken over France as well, which is part of what’s led to these guidelines.
Work/life balance = productivity?
The idea behind a “right to disconnect” is to restore some of the ever-blurrier boundary between work and life brought about by smartphones with email access. But the idea isn’t just to give workers a break — it’s that if you make sure people can turn off their phones when they leave the office, they’ll likely be more effective in the morning. In other words, a stronger boundary between work and life improves not only life, but work as well.
One interesting piece of Time’s reporting is that checking emails after hours isn’t always company mandated. It’s something that we all often know first-hand: In many cases, checking emails after hours is something we often bring upon ourselves — either out of a desire to get ahead, to be seen as busy and highly responsive, or, let’s admit it, out of boredom. But email begets email, and when everyone’s replying on an email chain after hours, suddenly you come into the office and you’re swamped. Time reports on how companies themselves are tackling the issue of after-work emails. Some companies are building time restrictions into their email clients. Others are formally discouraging using “reply all” to limit the number of unnecessary emails. Others are outright telling their employees not to email after hours.
So does the tendency to email around the clock begin with us, or our employers?
It’s a tough question. For our part, our policy as recruiters is that we should be responding to emails after work hours only for highly time-sensitive issues. We recognize the importance of downtime, even if it’s hard to mandate.
But what do you think? It’s unlikely that a law like this would catch on in the U.S., but is our after-hours emailing obsession making workplaces more productive, or is an always-on mentality leading to burnout and distraction?
Related posts:
