by Fronetics | Feb 2, 2016 | Blog, Logistics, Strategy, Supply Chain
Amazon’s ever-expanding foray into the logistics space could turn the industry on its head.
You can have bánh mì delivered in Chicago, toilet paper in Bangalore, and, pretty soon, packages under 5 pounds via drone in Tel Aviv. Students at the University of Pennsylvania don’t even have to leave campus to return an order.
Amazon’s continued expansion into the logistics market seems to be seeping into all corners of the world, making more and more products available with a single click. Inversely, the time frame for delivery keeps dwindling, from two days to the forthcoming 30-minutes-or-less drone-delivery service Prime Air. And more options in less time happy customers make.
Amazon’s commitment to getting packages into the hands of customers as quickly as possible could be the driving force behind its recent foray into the logistics space.
Planes, freights, and automobiles
The retailer still relies on trucking partners and a longstanding partnership with UPS. But the 2014 debut of the first sortation center in Kent and purchase of thousands of truck trailers in December 2015 suggested an effort to take more control of shipping. This is particularly true for the last mile of delivery — presumably to circumvent issues like the 2013 holiday fiasco.
But then came the news that Amazon China had registered to operate as an ocean freight forwarder in the United States. That means the company can deliver products from China on its own ships. Is this a first step toward entering the $350 billion ocean freight market?
Additionally, reports surfaced in early 2016 that Amazon is in talks with several cargo-aircraft lessors regarding a number of Boeing 767 jets, which can accommodate up to nineteen 88-by-125-inch pallets a piece. The Seattle Times speculates this move is an expansion of an existing trial operation out of Wilmington, Ohio, to determine whether Amazon should pursue a larger air-cargo operation.
Ocean freight and air cargo suggest an interest in controlling operations well beyond the last mile. Could this be the development of a full-scale, in-house logistics department that could independently manage Amazon’s fulfillment process? Or, perhaps, are these steps to manage something beyond the company’s own shipping and delivery?
Amazon hinted at such in a securities filing last Friday, referring to itself as a “transportation service provider” and “companies that provide fulfillment and transportation services for themselves or for third parties” as competition for the first time ever.
Amazon as a 3PL
For some time now, the media has been speculating about Amazon‘s intentions to enter the transportation and logistics market as a third-party provider. That would certainly fit the existing pattern: 1) begin operations to better support core retail business, 2) grow and leverage that infrastructure to sell to other businesses.
A prescient October 2015 analysis by Baird Equity Research Analyst Colin Sebastian notes the “powerhouse potential” that Amazon has in the market should it “extend its increasingly complex and technology-centric logistics and delivery platform as a third-party offering.” The report cites the growth of Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Marketplace as templates for the expansion of logistics services to external clients.
Sebastian says the highly competitive global logistics market has yet to fully capitalize on web-based technologies to address supply chain inefficiencies — and Amazon’s wildly successful cloud computing platform, paired with its complex delivery network, may be the answer. The result would be a disruption of incumbent businesses, such as UPS and DHL. “We believe Amazon may be the only company with the fulfillment/distribution density and scale to compete effectively with global providers,” the report says.
Amazon is already moonlighting as a 3PL through its Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) business, which debuted in 2006. The company recently revealed that FBA delivered more than 1 billion packages to customers in 2015. And Friday’s fourth quarter earnings report revealed Amazon’s sales, as a whole, were up 22% to $35.7 billion. You could say they’re doing something right.
The Baird report estimates the global fulfillment market as a $400-450 billion incremental market opportunity. Is this where Amazon has set its sights next?
Related articles:
by Fronetics | Jan 28, 2016 | Blog, Logistics, Supply Chain
Fronetics names the best of the best blogs in the logistics and supply chain industries.
The logistics and supply chain industries are catching on to how successful a blog can be as part of an inbound marketing strategy. Companies are creating content that not only fuels conversation about industry best practices, trends, and issues, but also helps drive business to their websites.
Fronetics Strategic Advisors conducted a survey in January 2016 to determine the top logistics and supply chain blogs in the industry. Here are the results:
Dallas, TX-based Transplace is a 3PL and technology provider serving manufacturers, retailers, and consumer and chemical packaged goods companies. Logistically Speaking is the company’s thought leadership blog. It tells “the latest and the greatest supply chain and transportation stories” through Infographics, interviews with logistics executives, and informative articles offering information and advice.
Readers love: the weekly “TIP list,” or Transportation Industry’s Progression, which curates a short list of articles concerning trending topics and advancements in the industry
Transplace’s CEO Tom Sanderson shares information, opinions, and analysis of factors affecting the supply chain — including company economic data, freight transportation regulation and legislation, and carrier and 3PL financial performance. The blog is rich with charts and graphs that offer big-picture insight on what’s going within the industry.
Readers love: Sanderson’s no-nonsense breakdown of the most pressing issues facing the supply chain
Jennifer Cortez, Director, Marketing Communications, is thrilled with Transplace being recognized by Fronetics and the industry:
“We are thrilled to be recognized as the top logistics and supply chain blogs in 2015. At Transplace, we pride ourselves on providing timely and relevant content to our customers and the industry. Our goal this year is to further connect Transplace and our thought leaders with emerging industry trends.”
Procurious is a UK-based online business network with news, education, discussion forums, and events for procurement and supply chain professionals. The blog goes beyond industry insights — it’s a savvy guide to career advancement and skill development. Articles are written for the modern-day professional, in sync with Procurious’s forward-thinking brand.
Readers love: original series like Life & Style and #firstmovers, which cover interesting, relevant topics in the procurement world.
Thank you to all who took our survey to find the top logistics and supply chain blogs!
Fronetics Strategic Advisors is a management consulting firm with a focus on inbound marketing. We create and execute successful strategies for growth and value creation. Unlike other firms, our approach is data driven. We know ROI is important, so we track and measure results to drive success. Read about our approach to inbound marketing, or get in touch.
by Fronetics | Oct 29, 2015 | Blog, Leadership, Logistics, Strategy, Supply Chain
We know that with the increasing growth of cyber-hacking and data breaches, investing in IT asset disposition (ITAD) is a growing necessity for companies. It is critical to ensure the safety of a company’s confidential live and stored data on all of its assets, ranging from computers, phones, servers, and hard drives. If breached, a company’s reputation, consumer base, finances and future viability are all at risk. What happens to data and technological gear after it is retired can be equally as critical as the current live data and in-service equipment. Proper disposal is not only important to the integrity and success of the company, its partners, and clients, but it may also protect the environment. While some sectors have strict regulations and requirements regarding ITAD, others do not, but whatever the case, the ethical obligation is huge.
The Cost of Hacking and Breaches
Akamai Technologies’ State of the Internet report showed that “hacker attacks on websites went up 75% in the final quarter of 2013, with hackers in China responsible for 43% of all attacks.” More recently, in 2014 the Cost of Cyber Crime Study was conducted by Ponemon and sponsored by HP. It found that crimes are more expensive, happen more frequently, and require more time to resolve than ever. It also found that crimes happened across various sectors (see below).
2014 Cost of Cyber Crime Study
- The average annualized cost of cyber crime was $12.7 million, with a range of $1.6 million to $61 million; an increase of 9 percent or $1.1 million over the average cost reported in 2013.
- There are an average of 138 successful attacks per week, compared to 50 attacks per week when the study was initially conducted in 2010.
- The average time to detect a malicious or criminal attack by a global study sample of organizations was 170 days. The longest average time segmented by type of attack was 259 days, and involved incidents concerning malicious insiders. The average time to resolve a cyber attack once detected was 45 days, while the average cost incurred during this period was $1,593,627 – representing a 33-percent increase over last year’s estimated average cost of $1,035,769 for a 32-day period.
ITAD: A Growing Business
According to TMR as reported in IT: Connect and Expand, the ITAD market will expand to $41 billion by 2019 on 141 million tons of used equipment. With the heavy responsibility that goes with ITAD in terms of proper wiping, disposal, reusing and recycling, more companies are working with 3rd-party service providers who specialize in ITAD. According to Business Wire 65 percent of companies larger than 10,000 workers, and up to one third of all businesses, are turning to 3rd-party service providers to manage end-of-life assets.
What if something goes wrong?
It makes sense with the increase of cyber crime that there would be cyber insurance. This may be one solution to protect yourself, however, according to observations made on the site Dark Reading, “cookie-cutter” cyber insurance might not be everything you need.
This post originally appeared on Electronics Purchasing Strategies.
You may also like:
by Fronetics | Oct 28, 2015 | Blog, Consumer Electronics, Data Security, Data/Analytics, Logistics, Strategy, Supply Chain
When it comes to IT Asset Disposal here are 5 must-ask questions for third-party providers.
When the industry thinks of data breaches it raises the specter of a savvy hacker lurking very far, and yet very close, intermingling with a larger organization of internet criminals, breaking into our technology and gathering most private information: credit card and bank account details, social security numbers, and personal health and income data. The recent breaches at Anthem insurance and the retail giant Target make users worry about the trail they leave when they swipe a card or populate a form with personal information. This is how individuals think identities might be exposed. Individuals often don’t think about what happens when a company retires old servers, computers, printers, copiers, and scanners. What happens to confidential data? This is something businesses must think about.
ITAD
Receipt, processing, destruction and disposal of hardware and software are a necessary and growing business. The Blumberg Advisory Group’s 2014 ITAD Trends Report shows that data security is the number one reason why companies implement an IT asset disposition (ITAD) strategy. News reports highlight examples of sensitive data being found on retired assets, frompersonal photos and information to matters of national security. The costs associated with data breaches and with the improper disposal of IT assets are great. They include financial implications such as penalties, the loss of customer loyalty, and the tarnishing of one’s reputation. To mitigate risk, asset recovery management is critical to companies operating in today’s global supply chain.
According to Transparency Market Research (TMR) as reported inElectronics Purchasing Strategies, ITAD represents an estimated $9.8 billion handling 48 million tons of discontinued or excess technology gear. According to TMR, by 2019 the predicted market will grow to $41 billion made on 141 million tons of used equipment. Concerns about data security have resulted in companies becoming more aware of the need for ITAD and the need to budget for it. In 2014, 87 percent of companies reported having an ITAD budget; 38 percent more than in 2012.
Outsourcing this complex work can be a necessity for many companies who don’t understand the intricacies, regulations, labor and cost of asset disposition. Electronically stored data is subject to stringent HIPAA/HITECH, FACTA, SOX, GLB, and FERPA regulations, complicating responsible disposal. Secure and thorough “wiping” of data is critical, and the environmental impact of retired assets is also a vital concern.
More and more companies, 65 percent of companies larger than 10,000 workers and up to one third of all businesses, are turning to 3rd-party service providers to manage end-of-life assets. The factors seen as most important in selecting a 3rd-party service provider include: adoption of industry-recognized compliance standards (97 percent); a well-documented and enforced chain of custody (95 percent); and high-quality, thorough client reporting (95 percent).
Reduce, Reuse, Recycle
ITAD is expensive and it can be risky. It is, therefore, important to find a 3rd-party service provider who can ensure as much safety and security as possible. Many ITAD companies have a split business model working with upstream partners to collect and process retired material, then turning to downstream partners who are looking to purchase used technology gear. Given this model, your server could be someone else’s server one day. Ensuring proper receipt and processing is critical.
Must-Ask Questions
These are must-ask questions businesses should ask 3rd-party providers before hiring them. Be certain these questions are answered thoroughly and confidently.
1. What is your specialization?
2. Is there uniformity in the process?
3. Who would manage our relationship?
4. How flexible are your operations?
5. What if something goes wrong?
Companies operating in today’s global supply chain need to take the necessary steps to mitigate risk when it comes to asset recovery management.
You may also like:
The importance of Asset Recovery Management in the Global Supply Chain
Content marketing ROI for reverse logistics companies
This article was originally published on Electronics Purchasing Strategies.
by Jennifer Hart Yim | May 18, 2015 | Blog, Logistics, Strategy, Supply Chain
This article is part of a series of articles written by MBA students and graduates from the University of New Hampshire Peter T. Paul College of Business and Economics.
Michael Hickey is a former fifth grade teacher turned business professional. His experience includes content marketing in the IT industry and operations management for United Parcel Service. He will complete his MBA from the University of New Hampshire in 2015. He enjoys long walks along the conveyor belt and Ben and Jerry’s ice cream. He lives with his wife, Betsy, in Dover, New Hampshire and they are expecting their first child in June.
4 questions to ask when determining if a 3PL is right for your company
Third-party logistics, or 3PL, is an industry on the rise thanks to the constant innovations in complementary industries like telecommunications, data analytics, and cloud technologies. To avoid confusion, let’s call 3PL what it is: outsourcing. But it’s not the kind of outsourcing that typically comes to mind when you hear the term. Rather, it’s a specific type of outsourcing related to the operations side of a company in areas like order fulfillment, inventory and warehouse management, or transportation of finished goods. As many companies, and perhaps your competitors, begin to employ some form of 3PL, you may be tempted to follow suit. But before you hand over the keys, consider whether or not 3PL is a good fit for your company by answering these four questions:
Question 1: What are your company’s core values?
Why do you exist as a company? What service or product do you provide that you believe is better than all others like it? And what are the core values that your company adheres to in good times and bad, for better or for worse? Core values make you who you are. They are the DNA of the company. Stonyfield Farm, for example, produces a variety of yogurts from their New Hampshire-based facility. One of their core values is that they use only organic ingredients, sourced from family-owned organic farms in their products. No ifs, ands, or buts. That’s a core value. It won’t change, during either boom or recession. And everything they do as a company must align with that. Your company’s strategic alignment stems from identification of its core values, and each decision you make as a company should work seamlessly with your strategic alignment.
Action step: Identify your core values. If 3PL conflicts with any core values, you should avoid forcing its implementation, even if there are cost savings to be gained.
Question 2: What are your company’s core competencies?
What are the things that your company does well? The Yankee Candle Company’s core competencies lie within their research and development and the chemists they employ. Their specialized skills and olfactory expertise drive the creation of precisely scented candles that make you say, “I know I smell a pumpkin pie, but I can’t find it anywhere!” Their competencies help them stand apart from the competition. You would be remiss to give over your core competency to someone else. If your expertise lies in local delivery and timely service, why outsource it to the guys with the brown trucks?
Action step: Identify your core competencies. If 3PL takes the place of any part of your core competencies, you could be weakening the overall value proposition of your company.
Question 3: Will using a 3PL provider allow you to enhance your core competencies to meet your company’s goals?
The purpose of debating whether or not to employ 3PL providers should not focus so much on reduced costs, which can be one of the foremost benefits, but rather whether or not it can enhance your core competencies and stimulate growth for your company. Is your goal to reach broader markets, but you lack the expertise to make it happen? Perhaps an e-commerce fulfillment provider could help you reach those markets. Do you have an outstanding product, but can only sell it to those within a small radius of your operations? Maybe this would be the appropriate time to call on the guys with the brown trucks.
Action step: Draw parallels between the service you wish to outsource and the goal it will meet.
Question 4: What is the cost to your company?
It’s the question that always needs to be considered. But don’t take this question at face value: we’re not just talking about how choosing a 3PL will affect the bottom line. Of course there will be monetary costs associated with hiring another company, and there is even a tipping point when using a 3PL may be cost ineffective. So after a careful cost/benefit analysis, consider the other costs associated with handing over part of your value chain to a third party:
Time costs: Does outsourcing add lead times or delivery times to orders? Decide whether possible time costs take away from your value proposition, or enable your company to meet larger goals.
Control costs: Are you willing to hand over direct control of part of your value chain to someone else? Keep in mind that it’s possible no one cares about your business quite as much as you do. Can you trust someone else to make the same kind of decisions you would make in respect to your company and its customers?
Reputation costs: What happens if a 3PL provider does not perform as anticipated? Will it put a blemish on your company’s image? If a farm outsources its delivery to a local trucking company, and the refrigeration in the trucks falters and causes food to spoil, will the customer assume that the trucking was bad, or do they just assume that the quality of the produce from the farm is questionable? It takes a long time to build up a reputation, and only a short time to dismantle it. Don’t risk it on a provider you can’t trust.
Action step: Vet your possible 3PL options to see whose values closely align with yours. It may prove to be a critical step in choosing the right provider as opposed to the cheapest one.
Third party logistics provides an avenue for companies to scale to capabilities they may never have had the ability to reach. Expanded consumer markets, faster delivery times, and more efficient inventory management are some of the benefits to be had. But before you get drawn towards the soft glow of higher revenues and wider margins through outsourcing, be careful to make sure that your choice to engage 3PL providers aligns with your company’s strategic plans. And if you do choose to outsource, take your time to find the right provider who can add the most value to your business, not just the least amount of digits on the balance sheet.
