7 things to consider when choosing the right outsource partner

7 things to consider when choosing the right outsource partner

Source: Simply Silhouettes

Source: Simply Silhouettes

Within the logistics and supply chain industries, the key to providing your client with an end to end valuable offering is providing the core value yourself and outsourcing the rest.  Finding the right outsource partner is critical to success. Here are seven things you need to consider when choosing a new outsource partner.

 1.      Culture and values

Choosing the right partner goes beyond capabilities. You have to consider the corporate culture as well. In addition to being able to do the work, the ideal partner should be able do it seamlessly by fitting with your team and with your client’s needs.

When evaluating a new outsourcing partner, it is important to look at their mission or value statements. How do these hold up to your own company’s mission and value statements? Are they well aligned? If they are, move on and explore the company further. If not, walk away. Mission and value statements speak to the core culture of the company, so if you can’t find common ground here, it is unlikely you will be able to build a positive working relationship.

2.      Standards and metrics

What standards of quality and delivery does the potential partner employ? Here it is important to look at their metrics and processes. How do these compare with the ones within your company? If they are similar, it is not only likely your systems will be able to work well together, but also likely that the two companies have a similar approach to standards of quality and delivery.

 3.      Investments

Next, take a look at where the potential partner has made investments. Has the company spent in similar areas to your company? Similar investments show business culture or strategy alignment. If the investments are different, find out why.

 4.      Financial stability

What is the financial health of the potential partner?  You don’t want to enter into a partnership only to find out in a few months that the company is not financial stable.  Entering into a partnership with a company that does not have its financial house in order is a costly mistake.  Take the time to do your due diligence.

 5.      Where will you stand?

What will your relationship be? That is, will you be a small fish in a big pond or a big fish in a small pond? When times are good this doesn’t matter, but when there is a customer satisfaction issue, it can mean the difference between client retention or client attrition. It is essential to know where you stand inside your partner’s organizational priorities. If you are comfortable with where you will stand, that’s great. If not, find another partner.

 6.      Long-term strategy

It is also important to look at the long-term strategy of your company and your potential partner’s company. Does the service they will be providing on your behalf align with their continuing plans? And with your ongoing plans? Continuity and service development is important to your company and to your customers. The potential partner needs to be able to provide the specified service for the foreseeable future and also needs to be able to grow with your company’s strategic needs.

 7.      Credibility

Finally, look to social media. What are others saying about your potential partner in an unfiltered environment? Are people pleased with the service the company provides? Are there any red flags with respect to the company or the service they provide? Social media can help call attention to potential issues.

Also talk with others within the industry – especially people who have worked with the potential partner before.  What was their experience?  Again, look for red flags.

By following these steps, you’ll be able to better evaluate potential partners and identify partners that are a good fit from both a business and cultural perspective.

5 things the supply chain industry can learn from Top Gear

5 things the supply chain industry can learn from Top Gear

The Stig

Here are five things the supply chain industry can learn from Top Gear. 

1.  Speed is essential

Jeremy Clarkson advises: “Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary… That’s what gets you.”

For the supply chain industry speed and stagnation can be deadly.  PwC’s Global Supply Chain Survey found that industry leaders (financially and operationally) have “supply chains that are efficient, fast and tailored – a model that lets companies serve their customers reliably in turbulent market conditions and that differentiates between the needs of different sets of customers.”

2.  Innovate

At the heart of every Top Gear episode is innovation.  Whether it be turning a combine harvester into a snow plow, a car into a motorhome, or designing a mobility scooter to that will “tackle the wilds of the British countryside,” the boys on Top Gear know how to get creative.

Innovation is critical to growth and to gaining (and maintaining) a competitive advantage.  Innovation can also save you money.  In Colin White’s book Strategic Management, he provides the example of Ikea.  Ikea redesigned their Bang mug with the pallet in mind.  By doing so they were able to significantly increase the number of mugs they could fit on each pallet (from 864 mugs to 2,024 mugs).  The product redesign enabled Ikea to reduce shipping costs by 60 percent.

3.  There is such thing as too much power

Fast cars are the lifeblood of Jeremy Clarkson.  However, after driving the Ferrari F12 Clarkson surprised everyone by pronouncing that the car had too much power.

As Lao Tzu said: “A leader is best when people barely know he exists, when his work is done, his aim fulfilled, they will say: We did it ourselves.”

4.  Be social

One reason the Top Gear boys have around 350 million views each week and are entered into the Guinness Book of World Records for being the “most watched factual show” is because of their banter.

In a Supply Chain 24/7 article Adrian Gonzalez notes that 30 percent of supply chain professionals currently block access to social media sites.  The reason being that “many supply chain executives and companies are stuck on the starting line because they can’t get past the word ‘social’ and the perception it creates.”  This needs to change.  As Clara Shih and Lisa Shalett point out in an HBR Blog post – it can be perilous to be a social media holdout.  That is, being a social media holdout means that you let others define your company’s reputation, your company is invisible and less credible, and your company is perceived by potential customers as being behind the curve.

5.  Never underestimate The Stig

 “Some say he never blinks and that he roams local woodlands foraging for mouse meat. All we know is, he’s called The Stig.”

The Stig sets lap times and instructs celebrity drivers on Top Gear; we know nothing else about him.  That being said he is an integral member of the team, effective at what he does, and is respected (he has a cult following inclusive of 6 million Facebook “likes”).

Within your company you most likely have a Stig – a silent performer who excels at their job.  Unfortunately, the silent performer often does not receive the accolades the more outgoing employee receives.  This is to the detriment of the company – your silent performer might be your star intrapreneur.

How to quit your job (without using interpretive dance)

You hate your job.  The hours aren’t right, the work isn’t stimulating, and you feel there are no growth opportunities.  Your new hero is Marina Shifrin and you play her epic resignation video over and over again in the hopes that you: 1) can get up the courage to quit, and 2) you can acquire some of those dance moves.

While going out Shifrin-style may seem like a good idea – it isn’t. Yes Shifrin’s video has gone viral and has gotten more than 15 million views in 10 days, but can you execute those dance moves?  Let’s face it – you can’t.  And even if you could, you’d be seen as a follower – not an innovator.

So what are you to do?

If you are truly miserable in your job start by determining why you feel this way.  Is it the position itself?  The company? The industry?  The hours?  The work-life balance?  Depending upon the answers to these questions it is possible that you could schedule a meeting with you boss or with HR to discuss your concerns.  Perhaps there are changes that could be made within your current position, or maybe you could be transferred to another division.

If, when you get right down to it, you feel it is time to say good-bye, say good-bye tactfully.  So how to quit your job? While going out in a blaze of glory may seem like a good idea, the fire that blaze creates – it burns bridges.

So, when it is time to quit – be prepared to give at least two-weeks notice and leave on a positive note.  The world is small.  Plus, you don’t want to leave the door open for your boss to one-up you.

Let’s take the vacation off the endangered list

Let’s take the vacation off the endangered list

Vacation

Vacations are going the way of the dinosaur.  I say – bring the vacation back.

The Center for Economic and Policy and research released a report in May on vacations – or lack thereof.  It turns out that the United States is the only advanced economy in the world that does not guarantee its employees paid time off.  That is right; the US is the only advanced economy that does not legally require employers to give employees either paid vacation time or paid holidays.  Given there are no legal requirements, what percentage of private sector employees receive paid time off?  Seventy-seven percent of employees receive paid vacation time, and seventy-seven percent of employees receive paid holidays.  Not surprisingly the higher the wage the employee receives, the more likely they are to receive time off.  Specifically, half of low-wage workers typically receive paid time off whereas more than 90 percent of high-wage workers receive paid time off.

Harris Interactive reports that people like the idea of more time off.  Specifically, 50 percent of workers who receive paid vacation time in the top 10 cities in the US say they would be willing to sacrifice a workplace benefit for more paid time off.  Ironically, although employees say they want more time off, 57 percent don’t take off the time they already receive.  In fact, each year there are 175 million vacation days which American workers are entitled to which are not taken.

So what about that vacation?

Those who do actually use their time off don’t spend the time unplugged.  A recent survey by Pertino found that 59 percent of Americans regularly work, check email, take a phone call, and do other work related tasks while on vacation.  Surprisingly, 47 percent of those surveyed reported that they are less stressed on vacation if they can stay connected to the office.

Are you one of the 36 percent who are conducting business from the beach?

The reality is that taking a true vacation is important to both physical and mental health.  Taking time off is better for work performance and productivity.  For example, a 2011 Harvard Medical School study found that sleep deprivation costs American companies $63.2 billion a year in lost productivity.  Ernst & Young offers another example.  In 2006 the company conducted an internal study of its employees and found that for each additional 10 hours of vacation employees took, their year-end performance ratings from supervisors (on a scale of one to five) improved by 8 percent. What’s more – retention rates were significantly higher among vacationers.

Security is another reason why employers encourage employees to unplug while on vacation.  The Pertino survey found that 77 percent of those who work on their vacation do not have access to their office network.  Because of this employees use unsanctioned or unsecured cloud services (32 percent) and/or bring their work computers and files with them on vacation (35 percent).  Public Wi-Fi hotspots are commonly used by vacationers, creating an opportunity for data, credentials, etc. to be stolen.

Vacations, true vacations, are endangered.  Let’s work to bring them back.

 

9 business lessons from Breaking Bad

9 business lessons from Breaking Bad

http://www.amctv.com/shows/breaking-bad

Breaking Bad, AMC’s award-winning drama, is dark, violent, gritty – and it offers 9 essential business lessons.

1.  Don’t cut corners; quality is paramount

Look, I like making cherry product, but let’s keep it real, alright? We make poison for people who don’t care. We probably have the most unpicky customers in the world.

You can make a million excuses as to why cutting corners is ok, but the reality is that cutting corners is not okay. Quality has a direct impact on your company’s productivity, profitability, costs, image, and customer satisfaction. Strive not to meet your customers’ expectations, but to exceed them.

2. Know your competition

While it is unlikely that knowing your competition is a matter of life and death as it is for anti-hero Walter White, it is necessary that you know who your competition is, what they are up to, and gain a competitive advantage. The company that is consistently first to the marketplace and is the best in the marketplace is the one that is noticed by customers.

3. Create strategic partnerships

You asked me if I was in the meth business or the money business. Neither. I am in the empire business.

Throughout the series, we watch Walt determine which partnership(s) will best serve to further his empire and then he does whatever necessary to establish those partnerships.  Walt takes things to extreme, but he does offer a lesson – strategic partnerships are an essential component to a successful business.

If you are interested in learning how to choose a potential partner – you can check out a previous post I wrote on Find[ing] Your Perfect Outsource Mate.

4. Stick to what you know

Look. Let’s start with some tough love. You two suck at peddling meth. Period.

It is important to know and respect your core competencies. As I wrote previously, you need to determine your company’s core competencies and how you can deliver the best value to your customers. Are there services at which your company does not excel, or non-critical services which could be carried out more efficiently/effectively if the service were outsourced? If so, you may want to think about outsourcing.

5. Right person, right position

You may know a lot about chemistry man, but you don’t know jack about slangin’ dope.

Want to be the best? Make sure you hire the best and that you have the right person in the right position. This means instilling a rigorous performance plan and communicating with employees. This also means thinking outside the box – moving people within the company, hiring from outside the industry, and even firing people.

6. Establish a culture of innovation

Innovation is essential to Walt’s quest to establish an empire.  While I don’t condone Walt’s murderous and vindictive actions,  the guy does think out of the box and does recognize an innovative idea when he sees one.

A culture of innovation is essential to a successful business. Establish a culture that encourages employees to aspire to innovation and rewards innovation.

7. Have a contingency plan

Did you not plan for this contingency?

It is important that you not just have a risk management strategy for the big events, but that you also have a plan in place to deal with the everyday events that are more likely to occur.

8. Learn from your mistakes

Never make the same mistake twice.

Mistakes happen and, as James Joyce points out -“Mistakes are the portal of discovery.” That being said, learn from mistakes, do not repeat them.

9. Motivate your employees

I don’t believe fear to be an effective motivator.

An Inc. article astutely points out: “When you think about it, the success of any facet of your business can almost always be traced back to motivated employees. From productivity and profitability to recruiting and retention, hardworking and happy employees lead to triumph.”

Is requiring failure the key to success?

Is requiring failure the key to success?

http://carriejacksonstudios.com/2.0/portfolio/paintings/surreal/the-key-to-success/#.UjdMv8ako2s

Last week Jason Seiken wrote a post for the HBR Blog Network on the necessity of failure for success.  The post, How I Got My Team To Fail More, described his efforts at PBS to create an entrepreneurial culture by requiring members of the digital team to fail.  Seiken wrote:

“Soon after arriving at PBS, I called the digital team into a conference room and announced we were ripping up everyone’s annual performance goals and adding a new metric.

Failure.

With a twist: ‘If you don’t fail enough times during the coming year,’ I told every staffer, ‘you’ll be downgraded.’

Because if you’re not failing enough, you’re playing it safe.

The idea was to deliver a clear message: Move fast. Iterate fast. Be entrepreneurial. Don’t be afraid that if you stretch and sprint you might break things. Executive leadership has your back.”

It has been five years since Seiken first introduced the failure metric to PBS.  During that period unique visitors to PBS.org have doubled, and in each of the first seven months of 2013 PBS.org has been the most-visited network TV site (beating out ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox).  Additionally, video views on PBS.org and PBS.org’s mobile platforms have risen 11,200 percent.

Was requiring failure the key to success?  Not all those who read the post believed that requiring failure was the secret to success.  Rather, many readers suggested that the creation of a culture of innovation, one supported by executive leadership, which was the inflection point for success.

The idea that innovation in business or an entrepreneurial culture is brought about by leadership is one put forth by many including Robert J. Herbold.  In his book What’s Holding You Back: 10 Bold Steps that Define Gutsy Leaders, Herbold submits that it is the responsibility of a leader to establish a culture of innovation.  That is, a leader must communicate a goal of innovation to his/her employees; encourage employees to aspire to innovation; reward innovation; and instill a sense of urgency.

I see innovation and entrepreneurism as the goal and not failure.  For this reason I believe the focus should not be on failure, but instead should be establishing a culture which supports innovation. Yes risk-taking and failure are likely components of innovation, but they are just that – components.  “Requiring failure” may be sexy, but I believe supporting innovation is more likely to be the game changer.

What do you think?  Is failure a requirement for success?  Should leadership focus on encouraging failure?