by Elizabeth Hines | Oct 22, 2013 | Blog, Leadership, Strategy, Supply Chain
Source: Simply Silhouettes
Within the logistics and supply chain industries, the key to providing your client with an end to end valuable offering is providing the core value yourself and outsourcing the rest. Finding the right outsource partner is critical to success. Here are seven things you need to consider when choosing a new outsource partner.
1. Culture and values
Choosing the right partner goes beyond capabilities. You have to consider the corporate culture as well. In addition to being able to do the work, the ideal partner should be able do it seamlessly by fitting with your team and with your client’s needs.
When evaluating a new outsourcing partner, it is important to look at their mission or value statements. How do these hold up to your own company’s mission and value statements? Are they well aligned? If they are, move on and explore the company further. If not, walk away. Mission and value statements speak to the core culture of the company, so if you can’t find common ground here, it is unlikely you will be able to build a positive working relationship.
2. Standards and metrics
What standards of quality and delivery does the potential partner employ? Here it is important to look at their metrics and processes. How do these compare with the ones within your company? If they are similar, it is not only likely your systems will be able to work well together, but also likely that the two companies have a similar approach to standards of quality and delivery.
3. Investments
Next, take a look at where the potential partner has made investments. Has the company spent in similar areas to your company? Similar investments show business culture or strategy alignment. If the investments are different, find out why.
4. Financial stability
What is the financial health of the potential partner? You don’t want to enter into a partnership only to find out in a few months that the company is not financial stable. Entering into a partnership with a company that does not have its financial house in order is a costly mistake. Take the time to do your due diligence.
5. Where will you stand?
What will your relationship be? That is, will you be a small fish in a big pond or a big fish in a small pond? When times are good this doesn’t matter, but when there is a customer satisfaction issue, it can mean the difference between client retention or client attrition. It is essential to know where you stand inside your partner’s organizational priorities. If you are comfortable with where you will stand, that’s great. If not, find another partner.
6. Long-term strategy
It is also important to look at the long-term strategy of your company and your potential partner’s company. Does the service they will be providing on your behalf align with their continuing plans? And with your ongoing plans? Continuity and service development is important to your company and to your customers. The potential partner needs to be able to provide the specified service for the foreseeable future and also needs to be able to grow with your company’s strategic needs.
7. Credibility
Finally, look to social media. What are others saying about your potential partner in an unfiltered environment? Are people pleased with the service the company provides? Are there any red flags with respect to the company or the service they provide? Social media can help call attention to potential issues.
Also talk with others within the industry – especially people who have worked with the potential partner before. What was their experience? Again, look for red flags.
By following these steps, you’ll be able to better evaluate potential partners and identify partners that are a good fit from both a business and cultural perspective.
by Elizabeth Hines | Sep 17, 2013 | Blog, Leadership, Strategy, Talent
Last week Jason Seiken wrote a post for the HBR Blog Network on the necessity of failure for success. The post, How I Got My Team To Fail More, described his efforts at PBS to create an entrepreneurial culture by requiring members of the digital team to fail. Seiken wrote:
“Soon after arriving at PBS, I called the digital team into a conference room and announced we were ripping up everyone’s annual performance goals and adding a new metric.
Failure.
With a twist: ‘If you don’t fail enough times during the coming year,’ I told every staffer, ‘you’ll be downgraded.’
Because if you’re not failing enough, you’re playing it safe.
The idea was to deliver a clear message: Move fast. Iterate fast. Be entrepreneurial. Don’t be afraid that if you stretch and sprint you might break things. Executive leadership has your back.”
It has been five years since Seiken first introduced the failure metric to PBS. During that period unique visitors to PBS.org have doubled, and in each of the first seven months of 2013 PBS.org has been the most-visited network TV site (beating out ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox). Additionally, video views on PBS.org and PBS.org’s mobile platforms have risen 11,200 percent.
Was requiring failure the key to success? Not all those who read the post believed that requiring failure was the secret to success. Rather, many readers suggested that the creation of a culture of innovation, one supported by executive leadership, which was the inflection point for success.
The idea that innovation in business or an entrepreneurial culture is brought about by leadership is one put forth by many including Robert J. Herbold. In his book What’s Holding You Back: 10 Bold Steps that Define Gutsy Leaders, Herbold submits that it is the responsibility of a leader to establish a culture of innovation. That is, a leader must communicate a goal of innovation to his/her employees; encourage employees to aspire to innovation; reward innovation; and instill a sense of urgency.
I see innovation and entrepreneurism as the goal and not failure. For this reason I believe the focus should not be on failure, but instead should be establishing a culture which supports innovation. Yes risk-taking and failure are likely components of innovation, but they are just that – components. “Requiring failure” may be sexy, but I believe supporting innovation is more likely to be the game changer.
What do you think? Is failure a requirement for success? Should leadership focus on encouraging failure?
by Elizabeth Hines | Sep 4, 2013 | Blog, Leadership, Strategy, Talent
Let’s face it, meetings can suck. A poorly planned and executed meeting is a waste of time and money, and it can be demoralizing. Meetings shouldn’t be like this. Here are nine tips on how to plan and how to run an effective meeting.
1. Purpose
Every meeting should have a purpose. Meetings are often set up to happen on a reoccurring basis. The reality is that many times these meetings take place solely because they are in our calendars. If there is no reason to hold the weekly meeting this Wednesday, cancel it.
2. Focus
Have a clearly defined singular focus. Having a clearly defined singular focus keeps the meeting on track. If a meeting has more than one focus it is likely that one issue will be covered in far greater detail than the other, that the meeting will get off track, and/or none of the issues will be adequately addressed.
3. Prepare
Do your homework. Prior to every meeting make sure you have read anything you should have read and that you have completed any tasks that you should have completed. Additionally, know the lay of the land. For example, if the meeting is about the company budget and your employees are anxious over budget cuts – know this and be prepared to address your employees’ anxieties.
4. Invite
Invite those who should attend and do not invite people who should not be there. For example, if the focus of the meeting is sales, make sure you invite the sales team. Another example, if the focus of the meeting is the performance of your HR team, don’t invite your research and development team.
5. Leverage technology
Technology abounds and it should be utilized. Getting everyone in the same room is no longer necessary. Take advantage of technology such as Speek, Skype, and GoToMeeting.
6. Communicate
An effective meeting is not a place for you to download or transfer information. If you present information a manner that speaks to attendees you will motivate your employees and create buy-in. (The Heart of Change by Jon Kotter and Dan Cohen is a great resource on effective communication.)
7. Time management
Create an agenda and stick to it. Start the meeting on time and end the meeting on time. A meeting that is scheduled for 10:00-11:00 should not run from 10:15 to 11:15. Furthermore, if a meeting is scheduled for 1 hour, the meeting should last one hour or less (no need to try and fill the last 15 minutes if the agenda has been covered).
8. Facilitate
A meeting needs a leader. If it is your meeting – lead. Leading does not mean speaking at people for an hour; instead it means facilitating the agenda. For example, if an important but off-topic issue is raised during the meeting – don’t allow the meeting to go off on a tangent. Instead, acknowledge the importance of the issue and establish a time to address the particular issue. Handled correctly, your employees will not view this as blowing off their input, but rather they will value the fact that you will allot the necessary time to the issue.
Facilitating the meeting also means not allowing one person to monopolize the meeting. Give everyone the opportunity to provide input, and speak up if the agenda is being hijacked.
9. Action
At the end of the meeting review the action items. Make sure the right people are put in charge of each item, that they know what they need to do, and that they know when the task needs to be completed.
by Elizabeth Hines | Aug 28, 2013 | Blog
Last week I wrote a post for EBN about how to increase profits by looking at financial metrics on a granular level rather than in aggregate. Understanding your financial metrics at a granular level is important in that it allows for a true understanding of what is happening, and what is not. It enables you to drill down and appreciate, for example, similarities, differences, and outliers. Being informed at a granular level enables better decision-making when it comes to determining how to increase profits. The post was met with a couple questions. Specifically, how often does one need to look at these metrics and how does one evaluate and react to numbers?
The frequency with which to look metrics depends upon the area of business. For example, inventory flows and manufacturing output should be looked at on a daily basis. Your sales pipeline, on the other hand, should be looked at on a weekly basis, and your financials should be looked at monthly.
Once a schedule has been established, the question is what to do with the data – how should the data be evaluated and when is it time to act? The reality is that there is no hard and fast answer to this question. When to act is dependent upon the type of business, its typical cycle, and the company itself. It is therefore important to develop a database that captures your metrics. This database should be updated with the same frequency that the data is collected (see above for suggested frequency). A historical database will enable you to quickly identify a data point that is deviating, positive or negative, from the historical. When this happens, it is time to act.
by Elizabeth Hines | Aug 13, 2013 | Blog
Done right, an internship program can be a positive experience for the student and for your company.
An internship, done right, will serve to prepare the student for their first job. It will teach them about responsibility, accountability, and about the industry. Done right, an internship program should bring value to your company as well. Done right, the program will foster new talent, bring in new ideas, and serve as a channel for bringing well-prepared talent to you team.
Here’s how to do it right:
Sit down with the intern on the first day and establish a game plan. Ask the student what they hope to gain from the experience. Ask them what their career aspirations are. As the conversation continues and you lay out the tasks and responsibilities for which the intern will be responsible, point to how these tasks and responsibilities will serve to help them on their stated career path.
I mentioned, giving the intern tasks and responsibilities. These should be real tasks and responsibilities. The internship is an opportunity for the student to gain skills, and to learn how a company works, and how to navigate the workplace. Asking the intern to make coffee, copy papers, or pick up your dry cleaning will not benefit the student or the company (if you choose to hire them after the internship) in the long run.
To this end, it is important that you hold the intern accountable. They should show up on time, meet deadlines, and they should dress in an appropriate manner for your office. If this is not happening, a conversation is necessary. Overlooking these issues is at cross purposes with a valuable internship.
Also essential – providing the intern with the tools they need to succeed and acting as a mentor throughout the internship program. Answer questions. Set up regular check-ins. Introduce the intern to others in the office.
One more thing to consider when doing an internship right – the laws which govern internships.
In June a federal district judge in Manhattan ruled that Fox Searchlight Studios had broken New York and federal minimum wage laws by failing to pay two interns who had worked on the set of the film “Black Swan.” Given that there are more than one million unpaid internships in the US each year, this ruling has opened doors for additional lawsuits and has companies taking a close look at their internship programs to determine if they are in fact legal. For clarification, companies are turning to the Department of Labor. The Department of Labor lists six criteria which an internship must meet in order for the internship to be an unpaid internship. In a 2010 New York Times article, Nancy J. Leppink, then acting director of the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division, is quoted: “If you’re a for-profit employer or you want to pursue an internship with a for-profit employer, there aren’t going to be many circumstances where you can have an internship and not be paid and still be in compliance with the law.”
Interestingly, Intern Bridge’s 2012 Internship Salary Survey found that 51.3% of students surveyed had internships that were unpaid and that the number of paid internships declined by 3.6% from the previous year.
Another interesting piece of information – a 2013 survey conducted by the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) found that paid interns were more likely to get at least one job offer and obtain a higher starting salary than students who had had an unpaid internship or no internship. Specifically, 63.1% of paid interns reported that they had received at least one job offer compared with 37% of students who had participated in an unpaid internship and 35.2% of students who hadn’t participated in an internship. With respect to salary, students who had participated in a paid internship reported a median starting salary of $51,930 as compared to $35,721 for unpaid interns and $37,087 for students who did not participate in an internship.
